America Has Become "Feminised" — and One Writer Says That's Why It's Failing
Helen Andrews argues that the United States has taken on traditionally feminine characteristics — and that this shift is eroding the country's ability to function. Her claim is not that women are unfit for public life, but that a specific set of values has come to dominate American institutions.
Helen Andrews argues that the United States has taken on traditionally feminine characteristics — and that this shift is eroding the country's ability to function. Her claim is not that women are unfit for public life, but that a specific set of values has come to dominate American institutions.
Andrews identifies several traits she associates with this "feminisation." The first is a preference for consensus and "getting along." In her view, institutions now prioritise harmony over conflict, which makes them slower to act and less willing to enforce standards. The second is an emphasis on fairness and "equity." Andrews contends that this focus has replaced a commitment to objective rules with a demand that outcomes be equalised, regardless of merit.
A third trait is what she calls "niceness." She argues that American culture has become increasingly averse to disagreement, treating directness and confrontation as unacceptable. According to Andrews, this discourages honest debate and rewards superficial politeness.
Andrews frames these developments as a departure from the qualities she says built the country: assertiveness, competition, and a willingness to accept hierarchy and unequal results. She does not claim that women are responsible for this shift, nor that feminine traits are inherently bad. Her argument is that a balance has been lost — that institutions once valued both "masculine" and "feminine" virtues, and now favour one at the expense of the other.
The thesis is deliberately provocative, and critics will note that it relies on broad generalisations about gender and culture. But Andrews's core question is a serious one: whether a society that prizes consensus, equity, and niceness above all else can still make hard decisions, enforce standards, and compete. Her answer is no — and she argues that America is already paying the price.
Related Editorials
The Blame Game: How Modern Politics Abandoned Solutions for Scapegoats
A growing chorus of analysts argues that Western democracies are trading problem-solving for finger-pointing—and the consequences may be profound. Something has shifted in the machinery of democratic politics.
# The Unraveling of Democracy: How Economic Insecurity Is Reshaping American Politics
A growing body of research suggests that financial precarity—not ideological polarization—may be the driving force behind democratic backsliding in the United States. For decades, political scientists assumed that citizens who felt economically secure would be more likely to participate in demo
The Quiet Collapse of American Influence: Why the World No Longer Listens
For decades, the United States wielded a unique form of power. It was not the power of bombs or banks, but the power of attraction.
The University’s Forgotten Purpose: A Warning from Kathleen Stock
Article: In a recent commentary, philosopher and author Kathleen Stock issued a stark critique of modern higher education, arguing that universities have drifted from their core mission. Her remarks cut to the heart of a growing debate about the role of these institutions in contemporary society.