Data Centers Gobble Up Land, Water, and Energy — While Voters and Experts Push Back
A growing backlash is emerging against the rapid expansion of data centers, as new reports reveal they consume massive amounts of resources while offering questionable economic benefits. In Pennsylvania, Governor Josh Shapiro’s $20 billion data center deal has sparked voter outrage over environmental costs, while experts warn that ordinary households are being forced to absorb volatile energy bills to keep the tech industry powered.
A report from the Spanish publication *La Marea* questions the promises made by data center promoters, arguing that their main feature is secrecy. In reality, data centers consume large amounts of land, water, and energy, causing negative impacts on local areas where they are built, and promoters cannot support their positive claims with solid evidence [179807].
The political fallout is already visible. Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro announced a $20 billion economic development deal last June tied to expanding data centers, but the project has caused him significant political trouble. Many residents now question whether cutting red tape for such projects is worth the environmental and infrastructure demands [179276].
Meanwhile, the strain on energy systems is exposing a deeper rift between tech giants and their political allies. A leading American law professor argues that the partnership between the technology industry and the MAGA movement is facing an irreconcilable contradiction, most visible in the electricity market. As data centers consume more electricity, ordinary consumers face volatile bills, serving as an “adjustment variable” to keep energy costs stable for the tech industry [175375].