Hong Kong Court Convicts 3 Tiananmen Vigil Organizers of Subversion—Sentencing Looms
Hong Kong’s high court has found three pro-democracy activists guilty of inciting subversion under the city’s national security law, a ruling that could carry a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. The defendants—including prominent figures Lee Cheuk-yan and Chow Hang-tung—were convicted for organizing the annual June 4 Tiananmen Square memorial vigil, which authorities had banned. Sentencing is scheduled for a later date, and defense lawyers have already signaled plans to appeal [223791][224411][224756].
The verdict, delivered by a panel of three government-appointed judges, marks one of the first major trials to test the scope of the national security law enacted in 2020. The court ruled that the organizers’ actions constituted an attempt to “subvert state power” by encouraging others to participate in unlawful acts aimed at undermining the government [224411][224805]. The trio were accused of promoting the remembrance event despite its official ban, with prosecutors arguing the vigil was part of a broader effort to destabilize the territory [224756].
Chow Hang-tung, detained since 2021, has written essays from prison describing the harsh realities of incarceration, including the lack of combs and mirrors in her cell. “In a place like prison, where anything that is personal is stripped away, it’s even more important to hold on to every means by which you can express yourself,” she wrote. “Don’t let uniform, depersonalised rules, dress codes, schedules, and behavioural requirements grind down your edges and mould you into a ‘model citizen’” [225161].
The Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China, which once organized the vigil, was disbanded in 2021 under the security law. Its leaders now face sentencing, with legal experts saying the case is a test of how far the city’s courts will go under the new legal framework [224824][224805].
The Hong Kong government has rejected international criticism of the verdict, calling it “baseless slander and smearing” from Western countries. In a strongly worded statement, officials said the court’s decision was “well-reasoned and sound” and dismissed external reactions as politically motivated interference in the city’s legal affairs [224824].
Rights groups and Western governments have condemned the convictions, saying they highlight growing restrictions on free expression in the territory. The case is expected to deepen concerns over the shrinking space for political dissent in Hong Kong since the security law took effect [223791][224756].
Hong Kong convicts activists in national security trial Hong Kong Tiananmen Vigil Organisers Convicted of Subversion Hong Kong activists found guilty in landmark national security trial Hong Kong court convicts Tiananmen vigil organizers of subversion Hong Kong Activist Writes From Prison: “Don’t Let Them Grind Down Your Edges”